Main menu

Pages

Manchin's climate change doubles automotive culture

featured image

Contributors via Bloomberg / Getty

Screenshot 2021-02-24at3

Moveable explores the future of transportation, infrastructure, energy and cities.

Here are some words you can’t find Sentence A bill to compromise climate change between Senator Joe Manchin and Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act on page 725. Explained by Ed MarqueeOne of the Senate’s most credible climate allies: public transport, as “the most important investment in environmental justice and climate behavior in American history.” bicycle. Electric bicycle. “Walking” or its derivatives appears once in a $ 1.9 billion budget to improve walkability or mitigate the effects of pollution from new highways and other power infrastructures. If history is a guide, it rarely actually improves walkability. Almost everything is directed at noise barriers and pollution monitoring systems. As with trains, rails are mentioned five times because they are not explicitly funded.

This is just a bill, and most bills are never bills. But due to the nature of the agreement between Manchin and Schumer, along with Marquee’s approval, the bill is the closest thing this administration has come to achieve something similar to climate law. It contains many provisions that clearly help reduce emissions. For example, tax deductions for electric vehicles, incentives for companies that manufacture solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries in the United States. The words Especially “offset” and “carbon recovery” are there Too often and comfortably Given that there is little evidence to support the validity of these ideas.

Proponents of the bill Claim By 2030, we will reduce carbon emissions by 40%. But by 2030, 40% is just a weighing station on the way to a 100% reduction by 2040 (or 2050, or so far, preferably yesterday). The goal should be to achieve a 40% reduction, with a clear path to reach 40% to 100%.Unfortunately, from a transportation perspective, and transportation The largest carbon emission sector in the country— This bill, In connection with bipartisan infrastructure lawMakes it difficult to reach 40% to 100% by establishing a wasteful and inefficient automotive culture over the next few decades.

Manchin’s press release stated that the bill was about “really all of the above” rather than the political agenda, but from a transportation perspective, it’s about only one thing: cars. This thread Alex Daugherty, a transportation reporter at Politico, gives an overview of transportation regulations. It is to subsidize people’s purchase of electric vehicles, and to subsidize the precious metals needed to manufacture electric vehicles and batteries.

Electric vehicles are clearly a necessary tool for energy transformation, but not enough. Electric cars may be sold as “zero emissions”, They are incredibly energy intensiveIn particular, pickup trucks and SUVs with batteries are, in some cases, large enough to power an apartment for a month. And the bill not only subsidizes those trucks and SUVs, but even accommodates their waste in their provisions. Trucks and SUVs can cost up to $ 80,000 to be eligible for credit. This is an increase in cost to account for the large amount of batteries needed to compensate for the inefficiency and aerodynamics of the vehicle, but the cost of a more efficient vehicle is only up to $ 55,000. .. (This is completely separate from the larger and less efficient commercial vehicles covered by other regulations.) The $ 55,000 credit eligibility limit for all personal vehicles makes perfect sense. That’s right, and it can even discourage mass production of large vehicles. It’s an expensive and inefficient EV, and few are better for the planet than gas cars. Despite the claim in Manchin’s press release that “this law guarantees market control,” the bill gets in the way of intervening in the market to encourage inefficient car production. It doesn’t become.

One of the most amazing discoveries I’ve covered about sustainability in the electric vehicle and transportation sector is that electricity doesn’t magically appear in outlets, and it’s very likely that electricity comes from fossil fuel-burning power plants. There are few people who understand that there are many. The use of electrical equipment alone affects emissions. On one memorable occasion, someone I know, who is generally a wise man, tries to claim that electric cars and all other electrical equipment have zero climate impact because they don’t have tailpipes. did.

Similarly, most people don’t understand how much power an EV is using, so let’s take an example. Today’s electric vehicle owners are generally thrilled to get an efficiency of 4 miles per kilowatt hour. Most will be less. However, if you are driving on the freeway at 65 mph, it means using 16 kW for an hour.At the same time, home air conditioners that operate at full tilt Using something like 4 kW.. Therefore, driving on the highway uses at least as much power as driving four air conditioners at a time. But in reality, most EVs drive less than 4 miles per kwh, and most people drive on the freeway at speeds above 65 mph, so the actual effect is probably that of 5 or 6 air conditioners. It seems that.

That’s why almost all transportation experts are in agreement. Not only do you need to replace your petrol car with an electric car as soon as possible, but you can also travel in much more efficient modes such as walking, public transport, and cycling. (There is also enough evidence that trip In such a way, it dramatically increases mental and physical well-being. This is a non-important consideration for countries that are struggling to deal with. mental When Physical Health pandemic. The number I hear most often is that one-quarter to one-third of a car trip needs to be replaced with a more sustainable mode. This is a goal. It’s much more achievable than I expected Because our streets and neighborhoods, like this bill, are designed only around the car. Electric bicycles are a powerful tool here because they use only a small portion of electric vehicles, but they provide easy and fast travel for tens of miles.that’s right Small EVs such as golf carts and “neighboring electric vehicles” Much like a small car, but with a top speed of 35 mph and uses some of its electricity. (Not included in the bill’s text.) The bill ignores all of this, doubling the car culture (the big car culture of the time) and calling it victory.

Many of Manchin’s statements on the bill are dedicated to ensuring “energy self-sufficiency.” This is an issue in the George W. Bush era and has been ignored. The actual workings of the global commodity market— And reliability. He doesn’t want us to be like Europe, relying on foreign forces for winter heat and summer cooling to move our cars and run our factories. It sounds like a wise goal. It also completely ignores that one of the best ways to reach this goal is to reduce electricity usage and become a more efficient society. Instead, the word “efficient” appears in his statement only about the infrastructure for exporting fossil fuels for profit.

This bill is a bittersweet moment for us, who have written, addressed and advocated a cleaner, more efficient and sustainable transportation environment in the United States. This is a compromise between what needs to be achieved today and what needs to be done tomorrow by fixing the status quo that needs to be changed. We do not have provisions for the most lasting improvement, such as encouraging the development of areas where people do not need to nearly double their electricity usage in their work, shops, parks and other lives. The world and spirit that have put us in this existential crisis in the first place.

Marquee also said that this is probably “the most important investment in environmental justice and climate change in American history” and that it must pass if there is hope to achieve similarities in national emission reduction targets. Probably correct. .. But paradoxically, it makes the true zero emission target much more difficult. It ensures that we are moving from the tailpipe to the power plant rather than eliminating surplus and waste.

Comments